<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I&#8217;m Just Not Into Essentialist Notions of Gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 03:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I’m Just Not Into Essentialist Notions of Gender &#171; We&#8217;ve Arrived! And other such myths.</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>I’m Just Not Into Essentialist Notions of Gender &#171; We&#8217;ve Arrived! And other such myths.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-40</guid>
		<description>[...] X-Posted at Peeling the Yellow Wallpaper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] X-Posted at Peeling the Yellow Wallpaper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m just a psych student, so I apologize but I can&#039;t really comment on how career counselling works or give suggestions to that effect. The randomness of the M-B results are specific to the situation I described, wherein I dislike choosing between two given options and tend more towards flipping a coin, so that&#039;s not a commentary on all results.

My point in bringing up the M-B (which upon re-reading I don&#039;t think I made clearly enough), which is and always has been very appealing despite its spotty authority, was how its wholesale buy-in to essentialist notions of rational vs. emotional thinking reflects again how popular and ingrained this thinking is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just a psych student, so I apologize but I can&#8217;t really comment on how career counselling works or give suggestions to that effect. The randomness of the M-B results are specific to the situation I described, wherein I dislike choosing between two given options and tend more towards flipping a coin, so that&#8217;s not a commentary on all results.</p>
<p>My point in bringing up the M-B (which upon re-reading I don&#8217;t think I made clearly enough), which is and always has been very appealing despite its spotty authority, was how its wholesale buy-in to essentialist notions of rational vs. emotional thinking reflects again how popular and ingrained this thinking is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh0</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>josh0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 16:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-30</guid>
		<description>Random Myers-Briggs test results are interesting. All career counsellors I have talked to love the idea. One claimed to predict people&#039;s personality type based upon how their face looked upon entering the room and speaking a greeting.

My interest here is in finding a place &amp; path for myself in this life.  If the personality types are so much more fluid than I have been told, then do you have suggestions for how I could reflexively choose what to do?

(I say reflexively because my approach to date has been trying everything that looks interesting. I seem to have to try out every option in order to learn what it&#039;s about--I&#039;m not so good at picturing social interactions from other viewpoints.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random Myers-Briggs test results are interesting. All career counsellors I have talked to love the idea. One claimed to predict people&#8217;s personality type based upon how their face looked upon entering the room and speaking a greeting.</p>
<p>My interest here is in finding a place &amp; path for myself in this life.  If the personality types are so much more fluid than I have been told, then do you have suggestions for how I could reflexively choose what to do?</p>
<p>(I say reflexively because my approach to date has been trying everything that looks interesting. I seem to have to try out every option in order to learn what it&#8217;s about&#8211;I&#8217;m not so good at picturing social interactions from other viewpoints.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-28</guid>
		<description>I think my biggest frustration with the rational/emotional dichotomy is that the whole thing is bull-pucky any way you slice it. That kind of division of thinking processes doesn&#039;t exist, and certainly not to the extent that women and men fall into one camp or the other. There are social pressures on *expression* of one&#039;s thinking processes, but men&#039;s and women&#039;s brains aren&#039;t hard-wired differently in that way. Cold and hot cognitive processes work in synch; they&#039;re not mutually exclusive.

This is one of the things that&#039;s always personally annoyed me about the Myers-Briggs test (which is a useless test that doesn&#039;t predict anything with any validity but *still* gets used all the time). I&#039;ve taken that test half a dozen or more times, and never with the same outcome. I either get the INTJ, INFJ, ISFJ, or ISTJ. Introverted and judging are consistent (well, yeah), but the sensing/intuition and thinking/feeling are totally interchangeable. Well, that&#039;s because the test dichotimize between rational (sensing and thinking) and emotional (intuition and feeling), but is designed as forced-choice. I end up picking randomly between &quot;rational&quot; and &quot;emotional&quot;, because I can&#039;t imagine one dominating the other for most of the pairs.

My rational decisions would be irrational to me if I didn&#039;t take my emotions into account. Everybody has emotions. They&#039;re useful and powerful, but in our society they are treated as second-class to rationality (and, surprise surprise, women get all the second-class adjectives). I LIKE being emotional, though I wish it wasn&#039;t frowned upon or treated as evidence of mental immaturity. I also hellaciously enjoy being RATIONAL. And I&#039;m sick of media/etc. suggesting that there&#039;s a honest and brain-deep dichotomy between the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think my biggest frustration with the rational/emotional dichotomy is that the whole thing is bull-pucky any way you slice it. That kind of division of thinking processes doesn&#8217;t exist, and certainly not to the extent that women and men fall into one camp or the other. There are social pressures on *expression* of one&#8217;s thinking processes, but men&#8217;s and women&#8217;s brains aren&#8217;t hard-wired differently in that way. Cold and hot cognitive processes work in synch; they&#8217;re not mutually exclusive.</p>
<p>This is one of the things that&#8217;s always personally annoyed me about the Myers-Briggs test (which is a useless test that doesn&#8217;t predict anything with any validity but *still* gets used all the time). I&#8217;ve taken that test half a dozen or more times, and never with the same outcome. I either get the INTJ, INFJ, ISFJ, or ISTJ. Introverted and judging are consistent (well, yeah), but the sensing/intuition and thinking/feeling are totally interchangeable. Well, that&#8217;s because the test dichotimize between rational (sensing and thinking) and emotional (intuition and feeling), but is designed as forced-choice. I end up picking randomly between &#8220;rational&#8221; and &#8220;emotional&#8221;, because I can&#8217;t imagine one dominating the other for most of the pairs.</p>
<p>My rational decisions would be irrational to me if I didn&#8217;t take my emotions into account. Everybody has emotions. They&#8217;re useful and powerful, but in our society they are treated as second-class to rationality (and, surprise surprise, women get all the second-class adjectives). I LIKE being emotional, though I wish it wasn&#8217;t frowned upon or treated as evidence of mental immaturity. I also hellaciously enjoy being RATIONAL. And I&#8217;m sick of media/etc. suggesting that there&#8217;s a honest and brain-deep dichotomy between the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Martin</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 12:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-27</guid>
		<description>agreed!

I watched it, I&#039;ll admit, and a little bit of me died with every &quot;If he&#039;s not...&quot; Ugh. Like Ashley said...Amen sista!! 


And Ash..I&#039;ll join that revolution with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed!</p>
<p>I watched it, I&#8217;ll admit, and a little bit of me died with every &#8220;If he&#8217;s not&#8230;&#8221; Ugh. Like Ashley said&#8230;Amen sista!! </p>
<p>And Ash..I&#8217;ll join that revolution with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ashley Bushfield</title>
		<link>http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/2009/05/01/just-not-into-it/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Ashley Bushfield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 07:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yellowallpaper.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-26</guid>
		<description>amen, sista.

can we also start the &quot;i don&#039;t have to wear high heels,socks, make up, smell like a bottle of chemicals, wear heavy metal in my armpits, have hair that looks good in the humidity, or wear something from the gap just to be accepted in business/politics/magazine&quot; revolution?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amen, sista.</p>
<p>can we also start the &#8220;i don&#8217;t have to wear high heels,socks, make up, smell like a bottle of chemicals, wear heavy metal in my armpits, have hair that looks good in the humidity, or wear something from the gap just to be accepted in business/politics/magazine&#8221; revolution?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
